5'6 122 lbs. Slim athletic build. Looking for natural implants. 250cc/275cc mpp or 270cc/295cc mppxtra. Currently 32 A bra. Nursed 3 kids.

Hi ladies!! I have my surgery scheduled for May 29th hopefully. I am looking for a natural look but definitely want nice full breasts. I tried on 250cc/275cc mpp at mt suregons office. I have assymetry so need to different sizes. If i wanna go a little bit more to 270cc/295cc doctor says I need to use moderate plus XTRA profile. I always thought i would get moderate because i want a natural slope and dont want to look augmented. But am I stressing out about such a small difference? Will it even be noticeable? The width or diameter is the same between all 4, 250cc/275cc mmp and 270cc/295cc MPPXTRA. its the projection that changes. I'm stressing over that. The moderate plus has a projection of 3.7cm and the mppxtra is 4.1cm. I am stressing over the projection bc I do not want the rounded upperpole and too look augmented.

 

Help!!!

16 replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • I tried on 250cc/275cc moderate plus. This is what it looks like. Will 270cc/295cc moderate plus XTRA be a big difference?

    Like
  • Do you know what your BWD is?  I went bigger than you are looking but I have UHP and they don't look extremely fake because of my narrow torso.  I'm only coming up on my 3rd week post op so I have a lot of upper pole fullness but they don't look ridiculous at all.  I'm 5'4", 112 lbs with a BWD of 11.5 and got 420/445 UHP. 

    Like
      • Fafa84
      • Fafa84
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Brass09 I believe he said 11.7 or 11.8. I forgot. But he didnt want to go over 12cm on width in the moderate plus.

      Like
      • Fafa84
      • Fafa84
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Brass09 What about the firmness? I want them soft and squishy. 

      Like
      • Brass09
      • Brass09
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Fafa84 currently mine aren鈥檛 squishy because they are so new but mine are the responsive touch from Natrelle so they will end up squishy compared to the gummiest ones. 

      Like
      • Fafa84
      • Fafa84
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Brass09 oh ok. So then im probably stressing out nothing then. Going up by .4 centineters in projection won't make a huge deal. Maybe not noticable? 

      Like
      • Brass09
      • Brass09
      • 1 mth ago
      • 1
      • Reported - view

      Fafa84 I wouldn鈥檛 think that you would even be able to distinguish that difference with projection. 

      Like 1
  • I just got 325cc over the muscle with a mod plus profile and I have a bw of 11.5-12. Max I think is 355cc with that profile. I am very happy with my results but totally could have gone with the 355 and prob not felt like they were too big. You are taller than me (I鈥檓 5鈥3) so I would suggest going over 300. I am only a month post op but think look very natural. If you鈥檙e worried about projection (I was too) I would look at the max at the mod plus vs high profile. 

    Like 1
  • We have the exact same stats (same height/weight/body type). I went bigger than you did, and mine look and feel very natural now. I don't think you'd notice the difference in projection between the two options you're weighing. I'd go with what the PS recommends. :) 

    Like 1
  • I was a 32a preop and about 125lbs, 5鈥6鈥. I got 305cc mod profile under the muscle and am now a 32D. I have tons of pictures posted if you want to go through and look 

    Like 1
  • Hi, you can take a look at my profile history to see some photos with and without clothes. I am 5鈥5.5鈥 and 120 ish lbs. My bwd is 13cm. I was a 32b preop. I got moderate profile saline 350/360 cc with a goal of having a natural look. I am happy with my results, but I鈥檓 considering a revision up in size/profile by around 50-100ccs as they disappear in clothes. 

    Like 1
  • You would barely notice the difference under the muscle. The fake full upperpole look will occur if you choose a cc and projection that maxes out what your breast tissue can support. I suggest you discuss the look you're trying to achieve with wish pictures for your surgeon such as "natural cleavage". Your surgeon should tell you what is achievable or not according to your body shape. 

    I also had asymmetry, but of 100cc difference. My left breast (right side in picture) was a full 34B cup pre-op and I got 275cc mod profile Allergen. My right breast (left side in the picture) was a full 34A cup and I got 365cc high profile. The profile has such minimal difference and the breast with the added higher profile is still actually flatter than the smaller implant side, even with the 1cm projection difference. 

    [Image]
    Like 1
    • DetectiveJudy btw I'm 5'6 and 130 lbs

      Like 1
  • I got Sientra mod plus in 235/255, dual plane, and also nursed 2 kids but my BWD is around 10/10.5.  With a max BWD your surgeon suggested of 12, you should be fine.  I'm almost 3 months and my projection is starting to normalize and look a lot less like a balloon.  I would probably go up to the 270/295.  I think in the long run you'll be much happier with the overall upper and lower pole that projection will give you.  

    Like 1
      • Fafa84
      • Fafa84
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      irin997 so youre saying if i do the 270/295 moderate plus xtra that had the extra .4 cm projection that I'll be happier in the long run?  Ir the smaller 250/275 moderate plus?

      Like
      • irin997
      • I can't believe I did it! | Sientra 235/255 Mod Plus
      • irin997
      • 1 mth ago
      • 1
      • Reported - view

      Fafa84 In my opinion, yes.  The difference is so minor.  Your pic above looks great (with the sizers) and maybe before your surgery see if you can try a mod plus extra to compare.  But the above looks great and I'm sure the larger size will look fantastic too.  

      Like 1
Like Follow
  • 1 mth agoLast active
  • 16Replies
  • 202Views
  • 8 Following

Helpful Links